← teodormaior.com Concept Edition 2026-Q4 First public edition

ADAS & Autonomous Driving Tech Radar

A proposed list of technologies for automotive ADAS and automated driving, with a ring assignment for each: Adopt, Trial, Assess or Hold. Rings follow the path from research vehicle to start of production, and every entry states its safety relevance. Select a blip or a row to read the rationale. Evidence, owners and history are illustrative examples, not data from a real OEM or supplier.

Built by Teodor Maior as a starting point for ADAS and automated-driving teams. To use it, copy the list, re-rate every entry against your own programmes, safety case and supplier landscape, and revisit it every six months.

Legend

Reading the radar

Distance from the centre shows confidence: the closer to the middle, the more strongly it is recommended. Colour shows the ring, the shape shows how the entry moved since the last edition, and the number links to the register below. This is the first public edition, so the movement markers show example history to illustrate how a radar changes over time.

Ring charter

What each ring means

Each ring is a recommendation with a defined risk level and a defined way to use it. The entry criteria are what the review group checks before it places a technology in that ring.

Movement rules

Moving between rings

A technology moves only when this evidence exists. If there is no agreement, the entry stays in, or drops to, the more cautious ring.

MoveEvidence requiredDecided by
New entryNormally starts in Assess, with a named sponsor, the function or ODD it could improve, and a time-boxed plan for simulation, lab or test-track work. It can enter Trial or Adopt directly when qualification or programme evidence already exists, or Hold when it is a known obsolete or non-compliant choice.Technology board
Assess → TrialA proof of concept with measured results (simulation, test track or research vehicle), a pre-development project or test fleet that agrees to use it, and a first view of the qualification and supply path.Technology board + programme lead
Trial → AdoptSuccessful sample phase or fleet use; safety and security qualification for the intended ASIL; SOTIF limits documented; supply secured for the vehicle lifecycle; homologation impact checked (R155, R156, R157).Technology board + functional safety manager + purchasing
Any → HoldA better alternative is in Adopt or Trial, the part or tool is obsolete or end-of-life, it cannot meet current safety, security or regulatory requirements, it caused field issues, or a trial failed.Technology board
Hold → RetiredThe last programme using it reached end of production and its service obligations are covered. The entry leaves the visual radar and stays in the history.Technology board + after-sales
Unchanged 3 editionsFaded out of the visual to keep the radar focused. The current ring still applies.Automatic
Register

All entries

The full list by quadrant and ring. Quadrants group technologies by kind; rings show how confident we are in them.

Process

How this edition gets published

Nominate

Engineering, research and supplier-management teams propose new entries or moves, with quadrant, ring, rationale and safety relevance.

Curate

The technology board removes duplicates, checks quadrant placement and collects input from functional safety, cybersecurity and purchasing.

Assess

A workshop reviews each new entry and each proposed move against the movement rules and the upcoming programme milestones.

Write up

Each new or moved entry gets a rationale, evidence, an owner and its safety relevance.

Publish

A dated edition is released every six months, timed before concept and sourcing decisions. Using a Hold entry in a new programme needs a technology board exception.

Market reality checkAs of October 2026

ADAS & Autonomous Driving Radar: market reality check

How the ring assignments on the radar compare with what the industry actually ships today, with a supply-chain legend for OEMs, Tier 0.5, Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3 suppliers across cameras, ECUs, domain controllers and radar.

Verdict

Where the radar stands

  • The safety and process core is right. ISO 26262, SOTIF, ISO/SAE 21434, ASPICE, HIL, AUTOSAR Classic and MISRA in Adopt match how every series programme works today.
  • The AI stack is placed a generation too far out. End-to-end driving models ship in series under driver supervision (Tesla FSD Supervised, approved in the Netherlands under UN R171 in April 2026; Chinese OEMs and Momenta/Huawei stacks). "Assess" understates this; Trial is the honest ring.
  • Radar is placed too cautiously. 4D radar was about 40% of radar shipments in 2024 and is becoming the default for new designs. It belongs in Adopt, with high-channel imaging radar in Trial.
  • Cameras are missing entirely. For a radar about ADAS, the camera chain (8MP front cameras, surround cameras, driver monitoring, serializer links) is the biggest gap. Driver monitoring is now a legal requirement in the EU.
  • Key regulations are missing. UN R171 (driver control assistance systems), UN R157 (L3 ALKS), EU GSR2 and the Euro NCAP 2026 protocols now shape product decisions more than most technologies on the radar.
  • The page has no view of who supplies what. The biggest market shift of 2025–2026 is commercial, not technical: OEMs source the ADAS "brain" from software-heavy suppliers (Mobileye, Momenta, Huawei, Horizon, NVIDIA, Qualcomm) or build it in-house, and classic Tier 1s are repositioning. The legend below covers this.
Ring check

Entries to move

Only entries where the market has moved away from the page are listed. Confidence reflects how well the evidence is sourced.

Entry on the pageRing changeMarket reality, October 2026Confidence
End-to-end learned driving policyAssess→TrialSupervised end-to-end systems are in series: Tesla FSD (Supervised) received Dutch type approval under UN R171 in April 2026 and has been recognised by several other EU states; Chinese OEMs and suppliers (XPeng, Li Auto, Huawei, Momenta) ship end-to-end or VLA-style stacks. Still Assess for anything driverless.High
4D imaging radarTrial→AdoptYole estimates 4D radar at about 40% of shipments in 2024, becoming the baseline for new designs. Split the entry: standard 4D radar in Adopt, high-channel imaging radar (Arbe-class, Mobileye imaging radar) in Trial.Medium–high
Next-generation centralised AD SoCTrial (keep, note SOPs)NVIDIA DRIVE Thor is in series production (European OEM programmes, Lenovo domain controller, WeRide robotaxi). Correct as Trial for most OEMs, but flag that leaders have moved it to Adopt.Medium–high
Vision-language models for scenario miningAssess→TrialOffline use of VLMs for data search and auto-labelling is now common in leading data pipelines. On-vehicle vision-language-action models are a separate, newer entry (Assess, with Chinese OEMs already shipping).Medium
Shadow-mode fleet validation, data engineTrial (keep)Table stakes for anyone shipping learned driving functions. Correct as Trial for a typical OEM or Tier 1; leaders operate them at fleet scale.Medium
FMCW lidarAssess (keep, add context)Mobileye ended its in-house FMCW lidar programme in 2025 to focus on imaging radar. This supports keeping it in Assess. The page lacks an entry for production lidar (time-of-flight), which Chinese OEMs fit widely.Medium–high
Zonal E/E architectureTrial (keep)First series vehicles with zonal or near-zonal architectures are on the road; most OEMs launch them in 2026–2028 platforms. Trial is accurate.Medium
Mixed-criticality hypervisorTrial (reword)The market question is now "cockpit and ADAS on one chip" (Snapdragon Ride Flex, Thor). Bosch and Qualcomm extended their partnership on this in 2026. Rename the entry to reflect the product trend, keep Trial.Medium
Gaps

Entries to add

New entryQuadrantRingWhy
8MP front camera with HDR and flicker mitigationPlatformsAdoptStandard for L2+ front sensing. Sensor vendors are already on their second and third 8MP generations (e.g. OmniVision OX08D20 in production from Q4 2026, OX08D30 announced September 2026).
Driver monitoring camera (DMS)PlatformsAdoptEU GSR2 requires advanced driver distraction warning for all new vehicles from July 2026, and Euro NCAP rewards it. Also the enabler for hands-off L2 and L3 handover.
"Thin" satellite cameras and radars feeding central computePlatformsTrialSensors send raw or lightly processed data to the domain controller instead of running their own perception. Cuts sensor cost and enables early fusion; needs high-bandwidth links.
Camera serializer links (GMSL, FPD-Link) and ASA Motion LinkPlatformsAdopt / TrialProprietary SerDes links are the series standard; the open ASA Motion Link standard is the one to trial for multi-vendor sourcing.
Single-chip RF-CMOS radar SoCPlatformsAdoptNXP, TI and Infineon dominate radar chipsets with integrated CMOS transceivers and processing; Calterah is rising in China. Lowers cost of corner radars.
Zonal controller MCUs with Ethernet and smart powerPlatformsTrialNew MCU generations (Infineon AURIX TC4x, NXP S32, Renesas RH850/U2x, ST Stellar) target zone controllers with TSN Ethernet, virtualisation and eFuse-based power distribution.
Production time-of-flight lidarPlatformsTrialFitted at scale in China (Hesai, RoboSense) and on European L3 cars (Valeo Scala). Trial for most European and US programmes because of cost.
Vision-language-action (VLA) driving modelsMethodsAssessNext step after end-to-end: models that reason over scenes in language. Shipping in China under supervision; validation and safety argument are open.
UN R171 (DCAS)StandardsAdoptThe type-approval basis for advanced L2 systems in UNECE markets, including system-initiated manoeuvres. It is what Tesla's European approval was granted under.
UN R157 (ALKS, L3)StandardsTrialL3 is in series but narrow and premium-only (e.g. Mercedes DRIVE PILOT, BMW Personal Pilot). Trial is accurate for most programmes.
Euro NCAP 2026 protocols and EU GSR2StandardsAdoptRatings and mandatory features drive the volume ADAS content (AEB, lane support, driver monitoring) for every European programme.
Legend

Who sits where in the supply chain

The classic tier model has a new layer: "Tier 0.5" suppliers that deliver the full ADAS brain (chip plus driving software) and work directly with OEMs, often bypassing or partnering with Tier 1s.

OEM

Vehicle maker. Owns the vehicle, the customer and type approval. Decides whether to build ADAS in-house, co-develop or buy a turnkey stack.

Tier 0.5

Full-stack ADAS/AD supplier: silicon and driving software, sometimes the whole system. Works directly with the OEM.

Tier 1

System supplier: delivers ECUs, domain controllers, camera and radar modules to the OEM, integrating Tier 2 parts.

Tier 2

Component supplier: SoCs, MCUs, radar chipsets, image sensors, serializers, power and memory chips.

Tier 3

Sub-component and materials: lenses, RF substrates, connectors, PCBs, foundry and packaging capacity.

Focus areas

Suppliers and trends by product

Names are examples of active players, not a complete or ranked list.

Automotive cameras

TierPlayersApproach
Tier 1Bosch, Aumovio (ex-Continental), Valeo, Magna, ZF, Denso, Hyundai Mobis; in China Sunny Optical and O-Film modulesFront camera modules with or without built-in perception; surround-view and driver-monitoring cameras. Aumovio reports top-three positions in camera and radar.
Tier 2Image sensors: Sony, onsemi, OmniVision, Samsung, SmartSens. Vision SoCs: Mobileye, Ambarella, TI. Links: ADI (GMSL), TI (FPD-Link)8MP HDR sensors with LED-flicker mitigation for front cameras; onsemi has secured capacity agreements with Denso for ADAS programmes.
Tier 3Lens and optics makers (e.g. Sunny Optical), connector makers (e.g. TE, Rosenberger), foundriesHeated lenses and cleaning systems for sensor availability; cost pressure from Chinese optics.
Trends
  • Camera count per car rises: one front camera for basic L2, up to 7–11 cameras for L2++ with surround perception.
  • Perception moves out of the camera into the domain controller, leaving "thin" cameras that stream raw video.
  • Driver monitoring becomes mandatory in the EU from July 2026 and is the gate for hands-off and L3 features.

Radar

TierPlayersApproach
Tier 1Bosch, Aumovio, Denso, ZF, Hella (Forvia), Magna, Hyundai Mobis; Chinese radar suppliers growingBosch and Aumovio are named market leaders. Aumovio reports 200 million radar sensors built and is expanding ADAS production in Texas. Bosch is preparing its own radar SoC.
Tier 0.5MobileyeDeveloping its own imaging radar as part of its stack, after dropping FMCW lidar.
Tier 2NXP, Infineon, Texas Instruments, Calterah; imaging radar chipsets: ArbeNXP, Infineon and TI lead radar chipsets; Calterah rises with Chinese supply-chain localisation. Single-chip RF-CMOS SoCs replace multi-chip designs.
Tier 3RF substrate and antenna makers, packaging (antenna-in-package), foundriesAntenna-in-package and waveguide antennas reduce module size and cost.
Trends
  • 4D radar becomes the default for new front radars; high-resolution imaging radar competes with lidar in cost-sensitive L2++.
  • Satellite radars send detections or raw data to central compute for fusion.
  • Chinese radar chips and modules gain share inside China.

ECUs and microcontrollers

TierPlayersApproach
Tier 1Bosch, Aumovio, ZF, Aptiv, Denso, Valeo, Magna, Hyundai Mobis; Chinese Tier 1s such as Desay SV, Joyson, Neusoft ReachFewer, larger ECUs: zone controllers replace many single-function ECUs; Aptiv is separating its wiring business to focus on electronics and software.
Tier 2Infineon (AURIX), NXP (S32), Renesas (RH850, R-Car), STMicroelectronics (Stellar), TILockstep safety MCUs remain the ASIL D anchor; new generations add TSN Ethernet, hypervisors and over-the-air update support for zone controllers.
Tier 3PCB, connector and power-component makers, foundriesPower distribution moves from fuses and relays to semiconductor eFuses in zone controllers.
Trends
  • From about a hundred ECUs to a few domain or central computers plus zone controllers.
  • AUTOSAR Classic stays on safety MCUs; service-oriented software moves to central compute.

ADAS domain controllers and central compute

TierPlayersApproach
Tier 0.5Mobileye, NVIDIA, Qualcomm, Horizon Robotics, Huawei, MomentaChip plus driving software. Mobileye: EyeQ6-based Surround ADAS for Volkswagen Group and others. NVIDIA: DRIVE Thor in series. Qualcomm: Snapdragon Ride, including Ride Pilot co-developed with BMW. Horizon: Journey 6 family from 18 to 560 TOPS. Huawei: Qiankun ADS. Momenta: software for several global OEMs in China.
Tier 1Bosch, Aumovio, ZF (ProAI), Aptiv, Valeo, Magna, Desay SV, Lenovo vehicle computingBuild the controller hardware around Tier 0.5 or Tier 2 silicon. Bosch pairs its vehicle computers with Snapdragon Ride; Lenovo was first to mass-produce a Thor-based controller.
Tier 2NVIDIA, Qualcomm, Mobileye, Horizon, Black Sesame, Ambarella, Renesas (R-Car), TI (TDA4), NXPMerchant SoCs compete on AI throughput, power and software tooling; Chinese SoCs win domestic sockets.
Tier 3Foundries (TSMC, Samsung), memory makers, packagingAdvanced nodes and high-bandwidth memory drive cost and supply risk for central compute.
Trends
  • One chip for cockpit and ADAS becomes viable for mid-range cars.
  • Leading OEMs design their own AD chips (Tesla, BYD, XPeng, Nio), which puts pressure on merchant silicon vendors.
  • Global OEMs buy Chinese ADAS stacks for China: Mercedes-Benz and Volkswagen ship vehicles with Momenta and Horizon driving software.
OEMs

OEM approaches

Three archetypes: build in-house, co-develop with one strategic partner, or buy a turnkey stack. Most global OEMs now run more than one, split by region.

OEMArchetypeADAS approach and partners
TeslaIn-houseCamera-only, end-to-end FSD (Supervised) on its own AI chips. First European approval in the Netherlands, April 2026, under UN R171.
BYDIn-house, with suppliers"God's Eye" across the range. Earlier versions used NVIDIA and Horizon chips; its first in-house driving chip (Xuanji A3) was unveiled in 2026.
XPeng, Nio, Li AutoIn-houseOwn driving software and own AD chips (XPeng Turing, Nio Shenji); Li Auto pushes VLA models.
Huawei-partnered brands (HIMA)Buy turnkeyHuawei supplies Qiankun ADS, compute and often the E/E system.
Volkswagen GroupRegion splitMobileye EyeQ6 Surround ADAS for global programmes; Horizon-based software via its China joint venture; E/E architecture joint venture with Rivian.
Mercedes-BenzCo-develop, region splitMB.OS with NVIDIA compute; DRIVE PILOT L3 in Germany and the US; Momenta-based systems in China.
BMWCo-developNeue Klasse with Snapdragon Ride Pilot, co-developed with Qualcomm; Personal Pilot L3 in the 7 Series.
Toyota, GMMixedToyota: NVIDIA design win, Momenta in China. GM: Super Cruise in-house, NVIDIA for next-generation compute, Momenta in China.
NissanCo-developNext-generation ProPilot with Wayve's end-to-end AI, targeted for fiscal 2027.
Mahindra and other volume OEMsBuy turnkeyMobileye EyeQ6-based ADAS; Qualcomm and Tier 1 systems for cost-sensitive programmes.
Cross-cutting

Market trends that should shape the next edition

  • Regulation now defines the product. UN R171 legalised supervised advanced L2 in UNECE markets; Germany has not yet recognised Tesla's approval, and EU-wide recognition is being discussed. L3 under R157 stays premium and narrow.
  • Software decides who wins, not sensors. Value moves from sensor modules to driving software and data pipelines; classic Tier 1s are partnering with Tier 0.5 suppliers rather than competing head-on.
  • China sets the pace and the price. Chinese OEMs and suppliers ship end-to-end systems, lidar and in-house chips at scale; their stacks now go into global brands' China models.
  • Sensor sets diverge. Camera-only (Tesla), camera plus radar (most volume L2+), and camera plus radar plus lidar (China and L3) coexist. Imaging radar is the swing technology.
  • Centralisation is real but gradual. Zonal architectures and cockpit-ADAS consolidation arrive with 2026–2028 platforms; most vehicles on sale still use distributed or domain architectures.
Supplier and OEM radarAs of October 2026

The autonomy race: who is at L2+, L3, L4 and L5

A second radar for the companies behind the technologies above. Rings show the highest automation level each company has in series production or in commercial driverless service today; the centre is L5. Quadrants show where each company sits in the supply chain, and the shape shows which way it is moving. Select a blip or a row for the details.

Rings · automation level
Shape · direction
Quadrants · supply chain

OEMs & AV operators · vehicle makers and robotaxi or robotruck operators

Tier 0.5 & Tier 1 · full-stack ADAS suppliers and system suppliers

Tier 2 · chips, sensors and lidar

Tier 3 · foundry, memory, optics, materials

Reading the race

What the radar shows

  • L4 is held by AV operators, not traditional OEMs. Waymo, Baidu Apollo Go, Zoox, Pony.ai, WeRide and Aurora run driverless services in defined areas. Their compute and sensor suppliers (NVIDIA, lidar makers, TSMC) sit at L4 with them.
  • L3 is a premium niche. Mercedes-Benz and BMW sell L3 in narrow motorway conditions; Honda's early L3 did not continue and others have paused L3 plans. GM targets eyes-off driving for 2028.
  • The volume race is at L2+. Almost every OEM ships supervised hands-off or point-to-point assistance. The competition is between full-stack suppliers (Mobileye, Qualcomm, Huawei, Horizon, Momenta) and OEMs that build in-house (Tesla, BYD, XPeng).
  • Nobody is at L5. No company has driverless operation everywhere, in all conditions, or a credible date for it. The L5 ring is empty on purpose.
  • Tier 2 and Tier 3 are level-agnostic. Chips, sensors and materials go into every level; the companies that gain most from L4 are lidar makers, high-end compute, foundries and memory.
Register

All companies

Placement uses public announcements and trade press up to October 2026. Where a step is only announced or planned, the entry says so. Check primary sources before relying on any single placement.